TwinTurbo.NET: Nissan 300ZX forum - How is what you're saying any different?
People Seeking Info
 
   


     
Subject How is what you're saying any different?
     
Posted by SeedyROM on January 28, 2005 at 12:47 PM
  This message has been viewed 317 times.
     
In Reply To Sorry, but that doesn't prove anything posted by aliaZ on January 28, 2005 at 12:30 PM
     
Message Why should we believe it over anything else? =) Clearly, I do value your input but just to use your own example, I'd have to say that things I read in multiple sources have inherently more clout than some guy on an internet forum. Again, not specific to this case, but in general. I agree you can't believe everything you read but that's not reason enough to drop everything.

As for this issue, let's not make a mountain out of a molehill as TT.net LOVES to do to blur the end result. The more you harp on one piece of information that I've admitted I'm not an expert on, the more people will think FMICs aren't that bad, which is WRONG. I have no problem admitting that I may be wrong on the exhaust stroke, but the point remains the same.

Can I get your focus for just ONE second because it seems like threads like this get confusing and people stray off the original point because they are bored and have nothing else better to argue about:

1. Do you believe FMICs are worth it on the Z32?

2. Do you realize that even though that one part of my explanation may be wrong, FMICs are still questionable at best in the benefits they provide?

2a. While specifically the exhaust stroke may not drive the the other side, wouldn't negating the cross-flow design still make SOME sort of impact when using an FMIC?

?


"When I rev the engine, I want people to think the world is coming to an end." - Homer Simpson

My Zs: www.zheaven.com - Have a question about either of my 300ZXs? Answers lie within.
Member: www.SoCalZCrew.com - Come find out how we do it in the West!

     
Follow Ups  
     
Post a
Followup

You cannot reply to this message because you are not logged in.